is his work aout one races struggle?
is it about social issues?
does he do it to get a rise out of people?
this guy is very interesting. he doesnt just do work for one race or one social order; its about anything that people dont or cant talk about. he says that no matter what the review, if people talk about his work then it is successful. he doesnt think success is in money or fame. i agree with that. i think to be successful, you have to accomplish what you set out to do. if you want to open up unopen issues and you get a rise then you are successful. a good review or a bad one is not a measure of how successful a work is. some people are more about making money or getting fame. they arent successful artists no matter how much they make. i think success is shown by people pushing the envelope and the outcome of that.
can he get more responses out of people or is he done?
is he as rebellious as he thinks he is?
what would happen if he attacked just one issue instead of all issues?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment